Monthly Archives: September 2015

Adele Hite presented at the Fifth International Conference on Food Studies

On September 18, CRDM student Adele Hite attended the Fifth International Conference on Food Studies at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia.  She gave a paper entitled, “Beyond ‘Good Nutrition’: The Ethical Implications of the Dietary Guidelines for Americans,” at the panel, Practice and Policies that Challenge Food and Nutrition.
The conference  theme was “A Cross Roads in Food Studies:  Alternative vs. Traditional Food Systems and Movements,” with topics that addressed agricultural, environmental, nutritional, social, economic, and cultural perspectives on food.  The conference welcomed a variety of scholars–from public administration to education to food science to cultural studies–for a truly interdisciplinary experience centered around the role that food plays in our lives.
2015 Food Studies Conference

Leave a comment

Filed under conferences, professional development

Larissa Carneiro’s Presentation at Conference in Material Religion at Duke University

12009580_934065953315160_5941663141770662643_n

This past weekend, Larissa Carneiro presented part of her dissertation at the Conference in Material Religion at Duke University.

Her paper investigates how Creationism mobilizes natural objects as agents in order to  turn the Book of Genesis into an account of scientific truth. She shows how this is done by comparing two different networks in which the brute facts of nature (ice, water, rocks, fossils, etc.) are assembled according to two different worldviews and made to produce different “truths.” Creationism, inspired by Scottish Realism, conceives that all matter is dead and inert, which subjugates its role to divine intervention. According to Creationists, by attributing evolutionary skills – self-determination – to the brute facts of nature, evolutionists deny the power of God over nature. She argues that if Creationism cannot be considered a science, it is not because it fails to follow the four features that Robert K. Merton described as the normative structure of science (as US courts have ruled in cases against Creation Science). It is because all the material actants of its network only work as witnesses to God’s existence. In short, what makes Creationism religion is its concept of materiality.

Leave a comment

Filed under conferences, professional development, Research